Languages such as common lisp, scheme and clojure facilitate the creation of. Common lisp also allows reader macros which allow you to change the behaviour of the reader. Part 2 of a presentation by rich hickey at the boston lisp meeting. Functions in clojure dont need a separate namespace like common lisp, so you can avoid funcalls when using higherorder functions. A fairly extensive introduction to clojure, with a presumption of prior knowledge of lisp. Common lisp the modern, multiparadigm, highperformance, compiled, ansistandardized descendant of the longrunning family of lisp programming languages. Macro writers would use language features that would generate unique identifiers e. In common lisp and other lisp languages, cons cells are two element structures that are the basis of all lists and essentially the programming language itself. In the questionwhat is the best programming language to learn first. I am writing a significant project in clojure at work because it allows me to write my code in lisp while a utilizing existing opensource and internal java libraries, and b utilize our existing infrastructure for ci, deployment, monitoring e.
But even if common lisp is the true answer, you wont completely waste your time by just picking some deceptively flashy alternative deceptive because commonplace cl doesnt show you all that its macros can do, and it has more kinds of macros than anybody. I was talking last week to some programmers who use the clojure version of lisp and it made me wonder if lisp is so great, why did this guy have to build a slightly different version instead of building a popular application program in an existing version of. Clojure neatly sidesteps the lisp1 vs lisp2 argument. When comparing clojure vs common lisp, the slant community recommends clojure for most people. Since clojure is designed for concurrency, it offers things like software transaction memory, functional programming without sideeffects and immutable data structures right out of the box. This allows you to introduce completely new syntax e. Clojure seems like a modern look at what an approachable lisp might be that isnt totally disconnected from the rest of the world. I slightly prefer the lisp1 approach, since it is simpler and the division between code and data.
This might be the reason that your friend describes clojure s macro system as weaker since clojure does not allow reader macros. Clojure is also a lisp1 like scheme so it doesnt have a separate namespace for functions and data. The common lisp hyperspec, a hyperlinked html version, has been derived from the ansi common lisp standard the common lisp language was developed as a standardized and improved successor of. Developers describe common lisp as the modern, multiparadigm, highperformance, compiled, ansistandardized descendant of the longrunning family of lisp programming languages. With regard to scheme, i believe it would be better for the world if every programmer and nonprogrammer knew it especially if they deal with language design. Lisp macros, on the other hand, operate at the syntactic level. I am currently reading let over lambda which mostly deals with common lisp macros, and, it too, is a very interesting language. Function and variables has different namespaces in. Clojure is a tool in the languages category of a tech stack. How the strengths of lispfamily languages facilitate building. Ive already been successfully deploying clojurebased applications professionally, and as ive gotten more into common lisp, id like to start deploying common lisp based applications as well. Developers describe clojure as a dynamic programming language that targets the java virtual machine.
If one looks at music software in common lisp, the code is on a higher level than. The list is a very central data structure in common lisp, especially when looking at educational content such as classic books. That means both variables and functions names resides in same namespace. Arrow macros provides clojure like arrow macros in common lisp 60 commits 1. Clojure for lisp programmers part 1 rich hickey youtube. Firstly understand that racket and clojure are both in the lisp family but were created and developed for very different reasons.
Common lisp is designed to get stuff done by working professionals. This means that the development team can focus their energies on developing features instead of. Doesnt seem to have a good macro debugger like in sbcl. The one thing that lisp programmers can agree on is how much better lisp is than c and similar languages. I have read several books on clojure programming clojure, practical clojure, the joy of clojure, and the manning early access edition of clojure in action, and i think it is a fantastic language. Clojure and common lisp can be categorized as languages tools. Clojure is designed to be a generalpurpose language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming. Clojure has a programmatic macro system which allows the compiler to be extended by user code. When mutable state is needed, clojure offers a software transactional memory system and reactive agent system. If lisp is so great, why do we keep needing new variants.
There are a few reasons i am working on becoming competent with common lisp. The current development process is communitydriven, overseen by rich hickey as its benevolent dictator for life bdfl clojure advocates immutability and. Common lisp is a lisp2 which has separate function and data namesapces so you can have both a function called foo and a data item called foo. Part 1 of a presentation by rich hickey at the boston lisp meeting. Many of the features of lisp have made it into other languages, but lisp s approach to codeasdata and its macro system still set it apart. As you learn to write your own macros, youll see how they allow you to extend the language even further so that it fits the shape of. Clojure is predominantly a functional programming language, and features a rich set of immutable, persistent data structures. Clojure macros and metaprogramming clojure documentation. I recently posted a patch to the abcl mailing list and got a very quick response from the maintainer. So what can you do with macros in a language like common lisp or clojure that you cant. The usual comparison is between bad cl and syntaxoptimized alternative x. Clojure a dynamic programming language that targets the java virtual machine. Clojure does not implement a full solution to hygienic macros but provides solutions to the biggest. Secondly, this code tries to handle lists in the classic lisp way, with recursion, and thats not what you typically do in clojure.
I have also been reading up on lispclojure macros in an attempt to better understand how to utilize them. Translating lists from common lisp to clojure dzone java. Common lisp is very much a multiparadigm language, perhaps unique in the extent to which its a language for inventing and experimenting with new paradigms as examples, ml was originally implemented in lisp, and one of the first haskell compilers was written in lisp. Clojure is a dialect of lisp and while it departs with some features of traditional lisps, the fundamentals are there. It is designed above all to interoperate well with common lisp. There is abcl which runs in the java machine, and there are nativecompiling cls that spin a standalone executable. See books like on lisp or practical common lisp for examples.
Qt4 with qtools gui programming in common lisp, part 15. The existence or lack thereof of cons cells in clojure might be one of the first things lispers notice when switching to clojure. Clojure isnt terrible here, but common lisp is definitely better. Those 7 lines of common lisp compress to 2 lines of clojure. The java interop worked fine, and id like to do a clojure project once it matures. Clojure is a homoiconic language, which is a fancy term describing the fact that clojure programs are represented by clojure data structures. Cloture is an implementation of clojure in common lisp. Clojure vs common lisp vs haskell what are the differences. Custom djula filters gui programming in common lisp, part 55. This is a very important difference between clojure and common lisp and most other programming languages clojure is defined in terms of the evaluation of data structures and not in terms of the syntax of character streamsfiles.
Common lisp cl is a dialect of the lisp programming language, published in ansi standard document ansi incits 2261994 r2004 formerly x3. Clojure is no exception and provides simple macro facilities for developers. By functionality, i mean the ability to manipulate code at compile time. The read table is currently not accessible to user programs. Clojure is read by the lisp reader and clojure namespaces are lisp packages. Greenspuns point was in part that many complex programs have builtin interpreters. The general problem of accidental capture was well known within the lisp community prior to the introduction of hygienic macros. Arrow macros provides clojure like arrow macros in common lisp hipetaarrow macros. In lisp you wont find many software that does not make heavy use of macros in all kinds of simple and complex ways. One major difference between clojure and common lisp.
Like defn, but the resulting function name is declared as a macro and will be used as a macro by the compiler when it is called. Porting clojure seems to be the thing to do these days. Lisp was originally created as a practical mathematical notation for computer programs, influenced by the notation of alonzo churchs. Common lisp macros by example tutorial lisp journey. Common lisp has multiple implementations and runs on multiple platforms. Yet lisp has fewer programmers and completed programs. If one looks at music software in common lisp, the code is on a higher level than building lists like that. Using code manipulation is really a big feature in lisp. When comparing clojure vs steel bank common lisp sbcl.
Ive got a clientserver project that i want to write in a functional style as a learning exercise, and because i think functional is the future. They are both pretty much equivalent in terms of what you can do with them, i. The compiler also has standard ways for you to specify if you want to steer it to safety vs speed or viceversa, etc. I use both common lisp and clojure in my daytoday work. Macros clojure koans walkthrough in light table ide duration. Clojure is ranked th while common lisp is ranked 20th. Clojures syntax quote automatically includes the current namespace to help avoid collisions in macros, giving you the. Clojure vs common lisp is kind of in similar situations as javascala and crustgo. This shows that macros are an integral part of clojure development theyre even used to provide fundamental operations. Haskell an advanced purelyfunctional programming language. Common lisp seems to be missing a number of things i like in scheme for this sort of thing.
This information is provided for programmers familiar with common lisp or scheme. Ask a lisper why anyone of sound mind would choose such an odd. Like other lisps, clojure treats code as data and has a lisp macro system. Macros are used to write codegeneration routines, which provide the developer a powerful way to tailor the language to the needs of the developer. Emulating some uses is possible in many languages, but it does not make it a central feature as in lisp. Tastefully designed by rich hickey, clojure is a lisp that can be used for real world work that leverages years of h. Cloture is in very early prealpha stages, but it has progressed far enough to load clojure. Many of the features of lisp have made it into other languages, but lisps approach to codeasdata and its macro system still set it apart. Clojure is a member of the lisp family of languages. Your program might not use the additional values, but your development.
Macros can be used to define syntactic constructs which would require primitives or builtin support in other languages. One major difference between clojure and common lisp hacker. Runtime section in practical common lisp jbm aug 10 15 at 23. Clojure extends the codeasdata system beyond parenthesized lists. Clojure extends the codeasdata system beyond parenthesized lists sexpressions to vectors and maps. Clojure vs common lisp detailed comparison as of 2020 slant. The more i read about macros, the more it seems like they provide the same kind of functionality as byte code weaving libraries. Tk literate programming in lisp with erudite common lisp macros by example. The design of scheme is particularly clean and simple, and the language itself is ea. Clojure for lisp programmers part 2 rich hickey youtube.
1040 1213 199 1583 1356 939 1266 776 1307 1241 1004 401 1471 356 186 189 435 1401 571 1080 1518 314 1223 435 285 400 21 67 809 1009 433 265 936 745 49 1278 598 119